Crossing the floor

Liebral, Liebral, Liebral. (no spelling mistake - it is LIEbral because all the lies they have given to Canada.)

"David Emerson said that he would participate in the debate regarding and possibly even vote for federal anti-floor-crossing legislation." posted by Braeden Caley a Liebral Bloger.

What is wrong with David participating in such adebate? Should Belinda Stronach (Tory - turn- Liebral turncoat) be involved in the debate? (She should have exposed the "Hidden Agenda" as soon as she switched sides. Just a thought. She could not because there is none.) Should any member of Paralament that crossed the floor be involved in the debate?

Why do tey usually crosss the floor?

A.) If a member believes that the party they represent are misleading their political beliefs -

Example of broken promises as the scraping of the Grits Support Tories Tax (that is GST for those who remember the Liebral promise.) Chretien and Paul Martin promised this. Chretien verbarly - though he denied it in national tv when asked by a waitress and Paul Martin by the printing of the Liebral Red Book.

Perhaps David knew about the verdict of the former Canada Mint director who was "fired" by PM Paul Martin and his severance package of about hakf a million dollars because he ws "enitled" to it. If this would have come out before election day the Liebrals would have been devastated - except for Toronto who would vote for corruption and poilticans who "bear false witness" to all Canadians no matter what.

B) Are corrupt and about to be exposed.

How many Liebrals will jump the "Titanic" when the books are opened and the waste of my hard earned tax dollars are not accounted for? The Auditor should look at all the agencies of the Government of Canada.

C) More interested in representing their voters and finally their consciance.

This is why , I think, David crossed the floor. As a back-bencher, in opposition, there is very little he could have done to help present "bills" that would aid all Canadians. All he could have done was complain about the changes that Cnadians WANT - as compaired to the power hungry Liebrals. His move was the best thing that could have done for the voters he represents, he has a voice in cabinet compaired to a whisper in the opposition.

Personally I think if a politician crosses the floor he/she should sit as an independant. That way he/she could vote for what he/she feels is best for Canada, not a political party. Both David and Belinda have an equal say in this debate - as well as others that crossed the floor for whatever reason. An examplw would be te "free vote" that the Conservitaves "promised" on the defination of "family" instead of following political party lines. (how many Liebrals wanted to vote one way but were forced by party policy to vote against their consciance and their voters?)

No laws have been broken. If there are to be changes, then AFTER the law is voted upon by Paralament and the Liebral Senate - which could take a year - then we all can complain and demand a recall - which by the way was proposed by the Reform Party of Canada - and sset limitations upon that particular politician. I think it is time the Liebrals stop complaining and get on with the best for Canada - pass the Conservitive bills. Have the Government be more accountable to Canadians and not political parties.


*<{:oD

I say, join the Clown Party of Canada. The official opposition of the Rhino Party - whatever they promise - we would doubble.

*<{:oD