Monday, June 01, 2009

Still commenting on other blogs.

To bad DeYawn was voted out by his own party .... although Biffy - the new American leader of the LIEberals - is just as bad if not worse.

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Been away, yet active

I have been on the road and commenting on other blogs since the last post. When I get a regular schedule I will be posting again.

The LIEberals are presently trying to get back into power through their leader DeYawn - who has bad communication skills in English. One has to listen very closely to what he says, and even then his message is not clear.

I also noticed that the Red [LIEberal And Green Party] or the R.A.G. party will not permit candidates to run in areas of Canada where they have a poor chance if getting elected. Such as DeYawn's ridding - where the Green Party will not run against against him. I wonder what they will do in Western Canada. Though it doesn't matter since they have to keep the votes in Central Canada to win a majority. Then look out Canada - all of the positive things the present government has done will be for nothing.

Thursday, March 08, 2007

CWB back under LIEberals

There are somewho still think the CWB is good foe Western Canada. I have stated several times that if Ont. and Que. were forced to be under the CWB, it would be gone within two weeks. LIEberals under DeYawn want to bring it back if dismantled, such as http://michelleoliel.blogspot.com/ [March 8, 2007] thinks it is a good idea.

The farmers that I talked to in western Canada at the least want a choice to be out of the CWB. At the same time, while talking to Eastern farmers many weere unaware of the tacticts of the CWB.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

I thought you were from Ontario. Only a LIEberal and farmers east of Manitoba think in such terms. The only farmers DeYawn stands up for is in Ontario and Quebec – for votes - knowing that if there is a level playing field it would not be good for them.

If the farmers in the East were FORCED into the CWB it would be dismantled in two weeks.
This dictatorial plan keeps western farmers in bondage to the point where some have been jailed for selling their own grain. Have you actually gone out west and talked with farmers that want it dismantled, or even given a choice to be a member? I don’t think so. The LIEberals have been concentrating on central Canada so long that the West “wanted in” but was constantly rejected. You think under DeYawn that the west will be free to choose, no way. Watch for the separatists out west, something that DeYawn is unaware of, but there is an undercurrent there that feel strongly to leave Canada.

No wonder DeYawn wants to bring the CWB back if the present government dismantles it – HE HATES THE WEST like all LIEberals. Most farmers want a choice – something that all the governments in the past until now didn’t consider. It is about time something was done for the Western Canadian farmers, and the present government is starting to listen to them.

I see you were the Vice-President of Journalist for Human Rights and Justice …. Why do you not want justice for western farmers? Their freedom of choice is gone under the CWB, and you want to keep it? Did you even know that some of the employees of the CWB receive a $1,000.00 bonus at Christmas because of “stress” while farmers are struggling? But what do you care, as long as the central Canadian farmers are protected by the LIEberals under DeYawn.

There are somewho still think the CWB is good foe Western Canada. I have stated several times that if Ont. and Que. were forced to be under the CWB, it would be gone within two weeks. LIEberals under DeYawn want to bring it back if dismantled, such as http://michelleoliel.blogspot.com/ [March 8, 2007] thinks it is a good idea.

The farmers that I talked to in western Canada at the least want a choice to be out of the CWB. At the same time, while talking to Eastern farmers many weere unaware of the tacticts of the CWB.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

I thought you were from Ontario. Only a LIEberal and farmers east of Manitoba think in such terms. The only farmers DeYawn stands up for is in Ontario and Quebec – for votes - knowing that if there is a level playing field it would not be good for them.

If the farmers in the East were FORCED into the CWB it would be dismantled in two weeks.
This dictatorial plan keeps western farmers in bondage to the point where some have been jailed for selling their own grain. Have you actually gone out west and talked with farmers that want it dismantled, or even given a choice to be a member? I don’t think so. The LIEberals have been concentrating on central Canada so long that the West “wanted in” but was constantly rejected. You think under DeYawn that the west will be free to choose, no way. Watch for the separatists out west, something that DeYawn is unaware of, but there is an undercurrent there that feel strongly to leave Canada.

No wonder DeYawn wants to bring the CWB back if the present government dismantles it – HE HATES THE WEST like all LIEberals. Most farmers want a choice – something that all the governments in the past until now didn’t consider. It is about time something was done for the Western Canadian farmers, and the present government is starting to listen to them.

I see you were the Vice-President of Journalist for Human Rights and Justice …. Why do you not want justice for western farmers? Their freedom of choice is gone under the CWB, and you want to keep it? Did you even know that some of the employees of the CWB receive a $1,000.00 bonus at Christmas because of “stress” while farmers are struggling? But what do you care, as long as the central Canadian farmers are protected by the LIEberals under DeYawn.

Friday, February 02, 2007

LIEbrals want to shut down Canada

The LIEberal government wants complete control of the West from the CWB to the oil industry. The LIEberals dislike anybody that can thing contrary to their plans. The LIEberals want control of Alberta tarsand production.

Source for comments:

" Y2Kyoto: Dion Liberals Would Control Oil Sand Development"

http://smalldeadanimals.com/ Feb 2, 2007

Does this also mean that the LIEberals will stop industry in central Canada?

Toronto has pollution so bad that on some days there are smog alerts, this is brought on by their manufacturing industry. The LIEberals should send all jobs to other countries such as China, India and other polluting countries.

The LIEberals should stop Bombardier and Air Canada grants _ since jets contribute to air pollution, not to mention any gas motor. Forget about the jobs - people not working will not pollute - unless they exercise.

Next they should stop all auto manufacturing in Canada and force all Canadians to use their feet or bicyclers _ try travelling between Regina and Winterpeg in winter.

Next the LIEberals should control _ or put a tax on _ exercise. [After all if a person exercises they breath harder and use more oxygen than a couch_potato]

Perhaps others can add to the list of what the LIEberals should impairment when they get [LOL] back into power. [The problem is, Ontario and Quebec still LOVE the LIEberals, even if they continue to mislead Canadians. - just like this UN report]

Seriously though, the LIEberal government has always disliked anything from the West and loves Ontario and Quebec _ in particular Toronto, the biggest polluting city in Canada.

The Tory plan is NOT perfect, yet at least they have suggested changes that the LIEberal government fears, since it would not only cut pollution but also emissions. But then again they might charge them of stealing their platform.

Saturday, January 06, 2007

Khaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnn!!!!!

I came across this petition on the post below. This should make your day J

I wanted to sign it as follows:

PET II Just got home from hospital I was born to see this?! When I grow up and am Prime Minister they all will pay.

I hope it is still up [go to petition and view signatures]

http://jasoncherniak.blogspot.com/



If Kham was an advisor to Harper, and Harper considered the advice, why would he be forced to decide? Who to choose? A leader who listens or a leader who is following “Baghdad Bob” saying that there is no problem within the ranks of the LIEberal party. Martin could have stopped him, Dion could have stopped him as soon as he was elected leaded – but didn’t.

Example of Leadership styles:

Dion says that he will bring back the CWB if elected. Does this mean that ALL farmers in Canada will be forced to be under the dictatorship of the CWB – this INCLUDES Ontario and Quebec farmers. [If Harper wants to loose every seat in Ontario and Quebec then he would say; “Ok, keep the CWB but ALL farmers in Canada will fall under the board’s rulings – he would loose every seat in the rest of Canada] The difference in leadership is that Harper wants to dismantle this Communistic/discrimination system and free Western Canadian farmers with a choice of how to handle their grain sales. Dion likes control and keeping people under bondage and believes in: “my way or no way” attitude.”

The latest ploy is Dion to distance himself from Khan and the environment by trying to get our proud troops out of Afghanistan, when victory is so close. France is pulling out of its commitment there, does he want to follow Frances’s leadership or stay committed to their agreement with NATO. [Does his French citizenship have something to do with this decision? I wonder] If he follows their leadership Dion can say the same about Kyoto agreement. {Though precedent was set when the first Red Book – of LIEbrals broken promised of breaking the GST GRITS SUPPORT TORIES tax – being abolished.}

The LIEberals are master promise breakers – just like when Dion and others did very little on environment while he was in charge. The LIEberal now have a chance to work on a all party solution to the environment, but will not because they cannot work with others because the “glory” would be shared by all – not just the LIEberals.

The LIEberals think of Canada last and powre first - The Clown Party of Canada would give that powre back by having all parties working together for the good of Canada and not the party.

Saturday, December 23, 2006

CWB Problem Solved

I know of a way to solve the problem of the Canadian Wheat Board.

Simply FORCE the Ontario and Quebec farmers to fall under the CWB rules. Can you imagine how the Ontario and Quebec farmers would feel to be treated equally throughout ALL of Canada?

The freedom to choose how their wheat is sold would be taken away. The wheat in their grain bins would belong to the CWB. (This sounds like the communistic system to me.) I grantee that in two weeks the CWB would not be around.

The LIEbrals [Dion] want to bring back the CWB, ok, then place All farmers throughout Canada under their jurisdiction. The LIEberals would loose so many votes that they would be like the Conservative party 14 years ago - two seats. They would never place them under the bondage of the CWB.

The LIEberal party will say anything, yet with Ontario and Quebec farmers exempt from the CWB, they can continue to take the freedom of CHOICE from Western Canadians.

(Personally, I think it would be good to keep the CWB under the umbrella of giving Western farmers a CHOICE of what they can do with their own grain, like in Ontario and Quebec.)

Friday, November 17, 2006

What Global Warming??

Canada has done the correct thing concerning global warming. The LIEberals did VERY LITTLE in its feeble attempt to curb emssions.The Conservitives were right in telling the world of the LIEberals lack of work on this so called problem.

There are several web sites that refute global warming uch as:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2324104

http://www.junkscience.com/news/robinson.htm

http://www.friendsofscience.org/index.php?ide=4

http://hometown.aol.com/baffauthor/warming.html

http://ourcivilisation.com/aginatur/moregw.htm

The list can go on and on.

If the myth of global warming was true, why didn't the other opposition parties take the LIEberals to task. The Conservitives brought it up, but the LIEberals said they were working on it. Ten years and during the last year before the election, did the LIEberals do anything, very little. The LIEberal party is responsable for the increase, because of their lack of action.

It is good to have a party the is interested in the envirement and has a made-in-Canada solution. Perhaps they might look into how the USA cut its own emissions.

*<{:oD